- Update 00_README.md: refresh architecture overview - Update 02_semantic_ontology.md: expand semantic layer design - Update 04_orchestrator_and_runtime_flow.md: add runtime flow details - Update 05_development_roadmap.md: refine milestone timeline - Update 06_data_contracts_and_governance.md: add contract specifications - Update 10_evaluation_and_testset.md: add evaluation framework - Update 11_ocr_invoice_architecture.md: enhance OCR architecture - Update 14_financial_document_canonical_model.md: complete model design - Remove weekly_execution_details/: deprecated in favor of agent week plan
199 lines
3.6 KiB
Markdown
199 lines
3.6 KiB
Markdown
# 评测集与质量控制
|
||
|
||
## 1. 为什么需要评测集
|
||
|
||
语义解析、本体字段、Agent 路由、规则命中都不能只靠人工感觉。
|
||
|
||
每次修改 prompt、模型、规则或路由逻辑,都应该运行评测集。
|
||
|
||
目标:
|
||
|
||
- 检查 domain 是否识别正确。
|
||
- 检查 scenario 是否识别正确。
|
||
- 检查 intent 是否识别正确。
|
||
- 检查 next_step 是否正确。
|
||
- 检查是否应该追问。
|
||
- 检查是否错误调用高风险工具。
|
||
|
||
## 2. 第一版评测集规模
|
||
|
||
建议第一版至少 300 条。
|
||
|
||
```text
|
||
报销问题:80 条
|
||
应收问题:60 条
|
||
应付问题:60 条
|
||
制度问答:40 条
|
||
风险解释:30 条
|
||
定时任务:20 条
|
||
模糊问题:10 条
|
||
叙述型报销:20 条
|
||
附件输入:10 条
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
## 3. 评测样例结构
|
||
|
||
```json
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "eval_001",
|
||
"input": "上个月哪些客户应收逾期超过 30 天?",
|
||
"expected": {
|
||
"domain": "accounts_receivable",
|
||
"scenario": "receivable_aging",
|
||
"intent": "query",
|
||
"next_step": "query_database"
|
||
},
|
||
"required_entities": ["customer"],
|
||
"notes": "应识别为应收账龄查询"
|
||
}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
## 4. 评测指标
|
||
|
||
### 4.1 字段准确率
|
||
|
||
```text
|
||
domain_accuracy
|
||
scenario_accuracy
|
||
intent_accuracy
|
||
next_step_accuracy
|
||
field_level_f1
|
||
clarification_accuracy
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### 4.2 工具路由准确率
|
||
|
||
```text
|
||
tool_route_accuracy
|
||
permission_decision_accuracy
|
||
confirmation_decision_accuracy
|
||
narrative_misroute_rate
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### 4.3 安全指标
|
||
|
||
```text
|
||
unsafe_action_rate
|
||
missing_confirmation_rate
|
||
permission_bypass_rate
|
||
low_confidence_unsafe_tool_rate
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
这些指标必须接近 0。
|
||
|
||
## 5. 低置信度处理
|
||
|
||
语义解析输出应包含:
|
||
|
||
```json
|
||
{
|
||
"confidence": 0.62,
|
||
"missing_slots": ["time_range"],
|
||
"ambiguity": ["应收逾期还是审批逾期"]
|
||
}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
当置信度低于阈值:
|
||
|
||
```text
|
||
confidence < 0.75
|
||
不执行工具
|
||
返回追问
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
## 6. 模糊问题样例
|
||
|
||
用户问:
|
||
|
||
```text
|
||
这个为什么还没处理?
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
不能直接执行查询。
|
||
|
||
应该追问:
|
||
|
||
```text
|
||
你是想查询报销单、应收款还是付款申请的处理状态?
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
叙述型报销样例:
|
||
|
||
```json
|
||
{
|
||
"id": "eval_reimbursement_narrative_001",
|
||
"input": "我今天去客户现场,招待了客户,花销了1000元",
|
||
"expected": {
|
||
"domain": "reimbursement",
|
||
"scenario": "daily_expense",
|
||
"intent": "create",
|
||
"next_step": "ask_clarification"
|
||
},
|
||
"required_entities": ["amount"],
|
||
"notes": "不能错误路由到应收查询"
|
||
}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
## 7. 回归测试流程
|
||
|
||
每次改动以下内容都要跑评测:
|
||
|
||
- semantic parser 模型或 provider。
|
||
- semantic parser prompt。
|
||
- ontology schema。
|
||
- Orchestrator 路由。
|
||
- 规则中心匹配逻辑。
|
||
- MCP 能力注册。
|
||
- 模型版本。
|
||
|
||
流程:
|
||
|
||
```text
|
||
Step 1: 加载评测集
|
||
Step 2: 批量调用 semantic_parse
|
||
Step 3: 批量调用 route_decision
|
||
Step 4: 对比 expected
|
||
Step 5: 输出准确率报告
|
||
Step 6: 阻止低于阈值的发布
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
## 8. 发布阈值
|
||
|
||
建议第一版阈值:
|
||
|
||
```text
|
||
domain_accuracy >= 95%
|
||
intent_accuracy >= 90%
|
||
next_step_accuracy >= 90%
|
||
unsafe_action_rate = 0
|
||
missing_confirmation_rate = 0
|
||
narrative_misroute_rate <= 1%
|
||
low_confidence_unsafe_tool_rate = 0
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
## 9. 评测数据管理
|
||
|
||
建议文件结构:
|
||
|
||
```text
|
||
server/tests/fixtures/semantic_eval/
|
||
reimbursement.jsonl
|
||
accounts_receivable.jsonl
|
||
accounts_payable.jsonl
|
||
risk_explain.jsonl
|
||
scheduled_tasks.jsonl
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
每行一个样例。
|
||
|
||
## 10. 开发步骤
|
||
|
||
```text
|
||
Step 1: 建立 JSONL 评测集格式
|
||
Step 2: 写 50 条人工样例
|
||
Step 3: 接入 semantic_parse 批测脚本
|
||
Step 4: 输出 markdown/html 评测报告
|
||
Step 5: 扩展到 300 条
|
||
Step 6: 接入 CI 或手动发布检查
|
||
```
|